This site is supported by Nobility Studios.

Search the Community

Search Filters


 Search Filters

Content tagged 'Science'

Found 5 results


Results

  1. ___________________________
    ***********
    Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ?? that what- what you have thought and done on every single second )

    can you tell me every single detail of your `1 cheapest Minute Or your whole hour, day, week, month, year or your whole life ??

    if you are not able to tell me about this life then what proof do you have that you didn't forget your past ? and that you will not forget this present life in the future ?

    that is Fact that Supreme Lord Krishna exists but we posses no such intelligence to understand him.
    there is also next life. and i already proved you that no scientist, no politician, no so-called intelligent man in this world is able to understand this Truth. cuz they are imagining. and you cannot imagine what is god, who is god, what is after life etc.
    _______
    for example :Your father existed before your birth. you cannot say that before your birth your father don,t exists.

    So you have to ask from mother, "Who is my father?" And if she says, "This gentleman is your father," then it is all right. It is easy.
    Otherwise, if you makes research, "Who is my father?" go on searching for life; you'll never find your father.

    ( now maybe...maybe you will say that i will search my father from D.N.A, or i will prove it by photo's, or many other thing's which i will get from my mother and prove it that who is my Real father.{ So you have to believe the authority. who is that authority ? she is your mother. you cannot claim of any photo's, D.N.A or many other things without authority ( or ur mother ).

    if you will show D.N.A, photo's, and many other proofs from other women then your mother. then what is use of those proofs ??} )

    same you have to follow real authority. "Whatever You have spoken, I accept it," Then there is no difficulty. And You are accepted by Devala, Narada, Vyasa, and You are speaking Yourself, and later on, all the acaryas have accepted. Then I'll follow.
    I'll have to follow great personalities. The same reason mother says, this gentleman is my father. That's all. Finish business. Where is the necessity of making research? All authorities accept Krsna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You accept it; then your searching after God is finished.

    Why should you waste your time?
    _______
    all that is you need is to hear from authority ( same like mother ). and i heard this truth from authority " Srila Prabhupada " he is my spiritual master.
    im not talking these all things from my own.
    ___________

    in this world no `1 can be Peace full. this is all along Fact.

    cuz we all are suffering in this world 4 Problems which are Disease, Old age, Death, and Birth after Birth.

    tell me are you really happy ?? you can,t be happy if you will ignore these 4 main problem. then still you will be Forced by Nature.
    ___________________

    if you really want to be happy then follow these 6 Things which are No illicit sex, No gambling, No drugs ( No tea & coffee ), No meat-eating ( No onion & garlic's )

    5th thing is whatever you eat `1st offer it to Supreme Lord Krishna. ( if you know it what is Guru parama-para then offer them food not direct Supreme Lord Krishna )

    and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
    _______________________________
    If your not able to follow these 4 things no illicit sex, no gambling, no drugs, no meat-eating then don,t worry but chanting of this holy name ( Hare Krishna Maha-Mantra ) is very-very and very important.

    Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare " and be happy.

    if you still don,t believe on me then chant any other name for 5 Min's and chant this holy name for 5 Min's and you will see effect. i promise you it works And chanting at least 16 rounds ( each round of 108 beads ) of the Hare Krishna maha-mantra daily.
    ____________
    Here is no Question of Holy Books quotes, Personal Experiences, Faith or Belief. i accept that Sometimes Faith is also Blind. Here is already Practical explanation which already proved that every`1 else in this world is nothing more then Busy Foolish and totally idiot.
    _________________________
    Source(s):
    every `1 is already Blind in this world and if you will follow another Blind then you both will fall in hole. so try to follow that person who have Spiritual Eyes who can Guide you on Actual Right Path. ( my Authority & Guide is my Spiritual Master " Srila Prabhupada " )
    _____________
    if you want to see Actual Purpose of human life then see this link : ( www.asitis.com {Bookmark it })
    read it complete. ( i promise only readers of this book that they { he/she } will get every single answer which they want to know about why im in this material world, who im, what will happen after this life, what is best thing which will make Human Life Perfect, and what is perfection of Human Life. ) purpose of human life is not to live like animal cuz every`1 at present time doing 4 thing which are sleeping, eating, sex & fear. purpose of human life is to become freed from Birth after birth, Old Age, Disease, and Death.
  2. Science is a religion?

    In the article “How To Defend Society Against Science”, Paul Feyerabend says that science is a religion because the science is taught through dogmas, and not as it should be, that is, through critical analysis and skepticism. Is this true? What are the examples of scientific authoritarianism these days?

    Thank you. Excuse me if I have written something wrong. My English is terrible.


  3. Introduction :





    Quickly, I'd like to confess something to you.

    I've asked this very question already, on different forums. I'm happy to provide the links to them actually, in case any bored person feels like reading through pages and pages of forum talk, or wishes to read the question in its original format.

    I've received lots and lots of answers, but none of these "discussions" has ever reached a conclusion. Many people don't understand, even more people think they do but obviously don't (I know how that sounds... I'm happy to accept this may be because of the way I ask and present the question) and even more people understand, provide a reply, yet in the form of a statement which I can only agree with or not, without being able to discuss the topic further. There are some people who seem to understand, provide thoughtful responses with arguments and engage in discussions, but for unknown reasons stop posting after a while before the matter is settled.

    There are lots of ways to approach this question, and it seems that one of the flaws in the way I chose to do it was in not being clear, as in, absolutely crystal clear.

    The question in the form I originally came up with is available at those links which you don't have to read either, because I will try rephrasing it in a simple way that hopefully doesn't cause too much confusion.

    But first, the links to passed discussions :

    http://www.sciencech...hp?f=67&t=21013
    http://dissidentphil...-scientifically
    http://www.skepticfo...hp?f=18&t=17655
    http://forums.randi....ad.php?t=229555

    You might think I am obsessed with this question, which I think I might be to an extent, simply because I don't think it should be so difficult to reach a definitive conclusion on it, yet I feel it is very important.

    Definitions with regards to the context I am asking the question in (the framework) :






    1. Physical is meant in physicist terms. It does not mean "material" or "has mass". It means "has one or more properties of the 4 forces that are the cause of all events in the universe" (which in theory should be measurable).

    I got those 4 forces from Wikipedia here : http://en.wikipedia....i/Cause#Physics




    2. Existence and "to exist" encompasses both
    a) anything that exists subjectively (such as Santa Claus in your imagination) or that exists objectively that we may be aware of
    anything that exists objectively irrespective of whether you are aware of it

    which means that it may or may not (I don't know) necessarily be composed in one way or another by the properties of those "4 elemental forces".


    3. Causality is intended to mean the link between the existence of an entity and any event that may be influenced by its existence in one way or another.

    (which is different from the physicist's usage of that word which is strictly defined and contained by those 4 forces, since the assumption in Physics is that they are "the cause of all events").


    4. Information / data / idea / meaning / language is defined not according to its form, or expression, or support in which it is stored, but as the actual message that is "understood" once that information or data or idea or meaning is interpreted.

    This (in my view) covers anything that goes through our senses (smell, taste, touch, sight, hearing) because those senses's function are by definition to provide information from objective reality to the subject which is then interpreted. (some may argue that the information is actually interpreted before it reaches the subject, regardless, as long as there is information on one side, interpretation in between which provides the subject with the message)

    Therefore, anything with any kind of awareness or sensor, receptor, interpretative or reading capacity applies that capacity when processing the information etc. (which means it is not limited to living things let alone conscious living things).

    Question :





    Assumption : Information / data / meaning / ideas and the messages that they contain exists

    The reason for this assumption is that information, data, and/or the meaning of what is communicated can be expressed, read, and understood. I can not conceptualise being able to read, interpret or understand something which does not exist, so I'm assuming that it does.



    Is it physical?

    a) If so, is there any kind of causality between it and anything else that is physical? (and how does that work?)


    If not, is there any kind of causality between it and anything else (physical or not)

    Seeing as I've discussed this quite a few times, I've started to develop my own conclusions, but do not wish to flood you in my first post if you know what I mean.

    Yet :

    EDIT (this is what has emerged from personal thought and online discussions : If it is not physical yet has a causality, how is that possible to explain according to "physics"? (because that contradicts the postulation that "those 4 elemental forces are the cause of all events in the universe").

    I think I should be able to demonstrate that "messages" contained within information / ideas and so on do have a causality, ie, they are the cause of an effect.






  4. 1. I admit it. Heidegger is beyond me.
    2. One work of philosophy that I've wanted to conquer for a while is Wittgenstein's Tractatus.
    3. I'm reading it now.
    3.1 The Kindle edition.
    4. I'm going to make some brief posts as I go along.
    4.1 Feel free to comment, criticise, ridicule etc. as you see fit.
    5. I trip-up on the second sentence - proposition 1.1:



    At first, this seemed wrong to me. Surely, things precede facts? On reflection, I think I get it. Things... "things" ... are created when we talk about the world. They are an expression of our categorisation of our experiences. There is nothing to say that our categorisations reflect the actual structure of the world. If we wish, we can come up with alternative categorisations. So facts are all we have. I take it that a fact is something that not only can be true or false, but actually is true. If something cannot be true or false it cannot be a fact. If it could be true but actually is not, then it is not a fact.

    Obviously, Wittgenstein is going to go deeper into this and what I just said may be vaporised when he does, but that's the way I see it two sentences in. Equally obviously, a lot's going to hang on those ideas of truth and falsehood; on what they mean and, indeed, on whether they survive at all.
  5. Hi, could anyone shed any light on this for me?

    I believe in a deterministic universe as far as I believe in causation and logic, and I understand the concept. I think I understand eternalism, but I’m having a problem putting the two together, could anyone explain how we can have an infinite number of realities spread out in the dimension of time, past, present, future all existing, and yet still have determinism for which we obviously need cause and effect? I think I’m perhaps not properly understanding eternalism.

    Thanks =)

    Vicky